
A UMass study on gaming attitudes and behaviors is said to be the largest in US history.
Gambling is an important topic in Massachusetts at the moment, as the state prepares for the coming of at least two big resort casinos within the next few years.
The University of Massachusetts at Amherst (UMass Amherst) has released a study that gives a baseline for the state of gambling in the state now, one that can then be used to track changes in long term studies in advance of that gaming expansion.
The study, which comes through the School of Public Health and Health Sciences at UMass Amherst, surveyed nearly 10,000 Massachusetts residents.
That’s sufficient to make it the largest gambling study ever completed in the usa.
Survey Establishes Baseline for Future Studies
The study had been praised by Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Steve Crosby, who stated it should provide an objective way to understand how a state will be influenced by gambling going ahead.
‘The most essential point is that we are establishing standard conditions for every socio and economic variable that would be impacted by the introduction of casinos,’ Crosby said. ‘Our researchers will then track alterations in those variables within the whole life of the casinos in order to know to a certainty the consequences also to inform mitigation that is data-driven for almost any potential negative consequences.’
The study was conducted between September 2013 and May 2014, with state residents being selected at random to complete the questionnaire.
The result was a wealth of information detailing exactly how people in Massachusetts gamble and view different forms of gaming.
For example, it turns out that about 72 percent of respondents reported gambling at least one time within the year that is past.
Most Massachusetts residents (about 60 per cent) said they played the lottery, while 22 % reported that they’d gone to a casino during the year that is past.
Residents Like Casinos, Although Not Locally
One topic that is hot the location happens to be how Massachusetts’ new casinos will impact current casino operations in Connecticut. The study suggests that officials in Connecticut are directly to be concerned: 65 percent of the Massachusetts residents who went to casinos visited resorts in Connecticut, a portion that should go way down whenever Wynn Everett and MGM Springfield are operational.
The study also looked into exactly how residents experience the state’s gambling expansion, which includes a slots parlor and up to three casinos that are full-scale. The clear answer was one that is heard in many communities throughout the continuing state: not within my backyard.
A strong 59 % majority of adults in Massachusetts said that they think gambling expansion will either have a neutral impact or be advantageous to the state.
Nonetheless, 46 percent believe that gambling expansion could be harmful in their very own community, while just 28 % trust casino expansion would be useful locally.
The research additionally found that illegal gambling ended up being fairly typical in Massachusetts. About 13 percent of residents had bet on sports within the year that is past while two % reporting gambling on unregulated online gaming internet sites.
More analysis that is in-depth of data gathered is expected to be released into the months to come. However, principal detective Rachel Volberg says that the real value in this study had been gathering information before opinions could be shaped by the introduction of casinos.
‘Not many people realize exactly how unusual it really is for a problem gambling study to be completed before some new type of gambling becomes available,’ Volberg said. ‘The Commonwealth is lucky that both the Expanded Gaming Act and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission therefore clearly and forcefully supported such an effort and I am excited to share our findings before any gambling enterprises begin operations in our state.’
Interpol Disbands €20 Million Anti-Match-Fixing Relationship With FIFA
FIFA President Sepp Blatter (right) and then Secretary General of Interpol, Ronald Noble, seal the deal. Interpol has now figured FIFA does not share the essential values of the statutory law enforcement community.’ No shit! (Image: cnn.com)
Interpol has frozen a €20 ($22.5 million) donation, paid to it by FIFA, to fund a joint program that is anti-match-fixing.
The integrity that is 10-year Sport initiative was built to stamp out fixed games orchestrated by criminal wagering syndicates, but Interpol said this week that the FIFA corruption scandal had made the relationship untenable.
‘In light of the context that is current FIFA, while Interpol is still committed to developing our Integrity in Sport program, i’ve decided to suspend the agreement,’ said Interpol Secretary General Jürgen Stock. ‘ All external lovers, whether public or private, must share the fundamental values and maxims of the organization, aswell as those of the wider law enforcement community.’
The terms and conditions of this deal, signed last year, state that that FIFA must remain ‘compatible with the concepts, aims and activities of Interpol,’ but, following arrest of seven FIFA officials due to the fact result of a massive FBI corruption probe, Interpol may be forgiven for feeling that the soccer body that is governing not held up its end of the bargain.
Why Now?
It begs the question, though, why had been Interpol, along with its access that is wide-reaching to expansive network of law enforcement agencies, uninformed of FIFA corruption in 2011?
The British press was crying foul as far back as 2006. This was the year that journalist Andrew Jennings published Foul! The Key World of FIFA: Bribes, Vote-Rigging and Ticket Scandals. It is said by the name all.
Additionally in 2006, Panorama, a BBC affairs that are current, broadcast a documentary asserting that Sepp Blatter had been investigated by Swiss police for attempting to wallpaper more than a FIFA bribery scandal.
Inside it, Lord Triesman, the former president of the English Football Association, described FIFA being an organization that ‘behaves like a mafia family’,
Swiss Humor
A follow-up Panorama documentary in 2010 accused Issa Hayatou, Vice President of FIFA, of taking bribes. He threatened to sue the BBC, but he didn’t.
Interpol’s willingness to bury its head in the https://casino-online-australia.net/planet-7-oz-casino-review/ sand was more concerning the fact that the €20 million FIFA paid to the law that is international agency constituted more than a quarter of its yearly budget.
Finally, though, with FIFA exposed and indicted by the usa, the only nation that dared to hold the organization to task, it ended up being too much, or to embarrassing, for Interpol to stomach.
On a lighter note, the FIFA communications director Walter De Gregorio cracked a ‘joke’ about his employers on Swiss TV this week, and believe us, it’s a zinger!
‘ The FIFA president, secretary general and communications director are all traveling in a car,’ grinned De Gregorio.
‘But who’s driving?’ he quizzed.
‘The police,’ he zinged.
Shortly afterwards FIFA announced that De Gregorio had plumped for to ‘relinquish his office.’
Ritz Club Sues Tycoon Safa Abdulla Al Geabury Over £2 million Gambling Debt.
Safa Abdulla Al Geabury, whose £2 million check that is dud when Ritz staff attempted to cash it the time after their gambling spree. (Image: standard.co.uk)
The Ritz Club, London’s famously high-end, high-roller casino, is suing A swiss home tycoon over a £2 million ($3.1 million) bounced check.
According to the Ritz’s filing, Safa Abdulla Al Geabury had written out the check to finance a gambling session one night in February last 12 months, but it turned into a dud as soon as the casino tried to bank it the following morning.
The Ritz can also be looking for an extra £200,000 ($310,000) in accumulated interest on your debt.
This has been reported that the casino, that will be owned by reclusive billionaire twins that are identical Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay, has been plunged into the red with a number of unpaid gambling debts, forcing it to pursue its debtors aggressively within the courts.
In line with the London night Standard, the casino has litigated against 10 high rollers in the year that is last in an effort to recoup 2013 losses of £12.5 million ($19.4 million).
Al-Daher Case
Al Geabury’s protection is he is a gambling addict and his staff needs known this and stopped him from playing.
He wants the debts written off, but he is on shaky ground with this line; in 2014 the casino won a similar tall Court battle against Noora Al-Daher, the wife regarding the Omani international minister.
The Ritz sued Al-Daher after she had checked out the casino in April 2012 and proceeded to lose £2 million ($3.3 million) in a hours that are few. Al-Daher failed to honor £1 million ($1.65) of her financial obligation. She promptly counter-sued the casino, claiming that the casino had taken advantage of her.
Al-Daher had claimed in court that Ritz Club employees encouraged her to continue playing a game of chemin-de-fer, despite having been made alert to her gambling addiction, and even allowed her to cash checks, which she claimed was illegal.
She also said that the casino have been under a ‘duty of care’ it had failed to fulfill towards her, a responsibility which.
Psychiatric Reports
Nonetheless, the court heard that Al-Daher and her family had apparently happily gambled away $5 million in Las Vegas a few months after her visit to the Ritz.
The judge said he was certain that, had Al-Daher been refused authorization to keep on gambling during the Ritz, she ‘would have been eager and likely to gamble at other casinos thereafter, and very most likely during her stay in London during the days or days after 3 April 2012. in governing in favor associated with casino’
The judge within the Al Geabury case, Mrs Justice Simler, meanwhile, said at a initial hearing that psychiatric reports happen commissioned to evaluate Al Geabury’s state of head in the time he lost the money and whether he had been accountable for his actions.
‘The essence is whether Mr Al Geabury has a gambling addiction plus the claimant’s familiarity with that,’ she said.