BLOG

....

A later, Silk Road Returns; Is Bitcoin in Bed with Bad Guys month?

26Feb

A later, Silk Road Returns; Is Bitcoin in Bed with Bad Guys month?

A typical sales web page from the original Silk Road, now rebuilt; the site sells illegal drugs, weapons, and much more.

Just one month following the FBI seized and shut straight down Silk Road online site known as the Amazon.com of drugs, weapons and worse it is back. Yup, into the annals of criminal history, this 1 has to be up there in the chutzpah department; it’s like the capabilities behind the website are totally thumbing their collective noses at U.S. federal authorities.

Are Bitcoins and Silk Road Founders Aligned?

Even more shocking, brand new allegations tie Silk Road’s founder Ross William Ulbricht aka Dread Pirate Roberts until his FBI takedown last thirty days to your still publicly unidentified original creator of Bitcoins, the digital currency exclusively utilized to fund illegal products and services on the old and now brand new site.

The allegations came to light after two Israeli boffins one a cryptographer readied a paper that is soon-to-be-published claims that the FBI seizure in fact just got their fingers on about 22 percent of the $80 million in commissions Ulbricht’s web site had garnered from sales of an estimated $1.2 billion; sales on everything which range from assault tools to illegal narcotics of any kind and even for hit men services for hire.

Dorit Ron and Adi Shamir will be the two researchers that have brought these allegations to light, adding which they on their own have actually only been able to locate one-third of the total commissions the website pulled in.

But the tale gets even more fascinating; the two researchers have actually additionally been buying a possible connection between Ulbricht and ‘Satoshi Nakamoto’, the shrouded and never-seen creator of the Bitcoin electronic currency exclusively utilized on the illegal site, mostly due to its relative untraceability, since it is perhaps not tied in to any banking system that is central. Bitcoins’ value is entirely determined by market demand, and lately, that need has been curiously skyrocketing, with one Bitcoin being valued at over $800 and climbing recently. Exactly What does it all soon add up to?

Connecting the Dots

The two Israelis have been able to trace some paths back and possess made some connections between Silk Road and Bitcoins that are more than simply business usage. They are able to do so because although the marketplace that is actual may present anonymously, the transactions themselves are totally public. The pair created their own graph so they could track statistically how users interacted on the Silk Road site after getting their hands on a complete listing of all the Bitcoin transactions made this year.

The scientists uncovered a single transfer log that followed Bitcoins deposited into an account now known to be Ulbricht’s in doing this extensive research. That deposit stemmed from another account, produced in 2009, which placed the latter at early Bitcoin network time; it had all only gone public a year prior january. And even though the Israelis say they can’t definitively prove that that early Bitcoin account was ‘Nakamoto’s’, there is good reason to trust it very perhaps could indicate an ‘investment’ of sorts in the 1st Silk Road site. Does this time to a connection that is dark Silk Road and Bitcoins?

It might. Another compelling bit of data uncovered by the Israelis had been a 1,000 Bitcoin transfer made in March of this year. That amount would have translated to about $60,000; but with the current insane value surge in the cryptocurrency, it’s now about $847,000 worth at the time of transfer.

‘Such a single transfer that is large not represent the normal behavior of a buyer who opens a free account on Silk Road in order to buy some narcotics (such buyers are expected to make a preliminary deposit of tens or hundreds of dollars, and also to top the account off whenever they buy additional merchandise). It could represent either large-scale activity on Silk path, or some type of investment or partnership, but this is pure speculation,’ note the researchers.

Even more damning is that the depositor that is unidentified had some 77,600 Bitcoins apparently obtained through ‘mining’ operations; that amount would now equal about $64 million in U.S. currency.

‘ The path that is short found suggests (but does not prove) the existence of a surprising website link between the two mysterious figures of the Bitcoin community, Satoshi Nakamoto and DPR,’ wrote Ron and Shamir. ‘DPR’ refers to Ulbrict’s Silk Road code name, Dread Pirate Roberts.

In a few methods, it turns out that Bitcoins’ perennial claim it exists beyond the long supply of the law has proved to be correct. The experts say the cryptographic design and veiled movement associated with currency causes it to be much more difficult for police to seize it than, say, a drug dealer’s stash of thousands hidden in a household. The duo also speculate that there could have been a 2nd as yet computer that is undiscovered towards the Silk Road founder that the FBI hasn’t yet had the oppertunity to locate.

So far, the feds, not interestingly, don’t have any discuss any one of it. If we know anything about anything, someone is in a production meeting in Hollywood right now, casting ‘The Long and Winding Silk Road’ for a cable series that is new.

Silk Path 2.0: How Were They Able To Get a Revised Web Site Up So Immediately After Power Down?

How could a high-profile, illegal website seized by the Feds be up and running again a month later? Apparently, where there exists a will, there’s a way. A few billion bucks at stake doesn’t hurt either.

It took hardly a moment, it seems, for an anonymous previously active Silk Road user to email top that is former about the intention to get the site alive once more. A forum called the ‘Vendor Roundtable’ had been formed, and on it, the framework for recreating the site that is illicit.

The forum’s admin even put up a ‘Help Wanted’ ad for the ‘communication specialist’ somebody who would oversee and coordinate the different pieces parts of the rebuilding process. ‘You will be assigned work to perform considering what has to be done,’ see the cryptic ad; no reference to what kind of money was involved, evidently.

And therefore, final week, voilà! Silk Road 2.0 appeared; the difference that is only in its absence, some competitive web sites had cropped up to fill the void, all run on the secretive Thor server. The new Silk Road is a cornucopia of illegal goods and services, from heroin to hit men like its predecessor.

‘Silk Road was something which had appeal,’ an anonymous and shrouded user told CNNMoney in a TV interview where even his voice was disguised. ‘That made it simple for individuals to continue down that path. As long it does not matter exactly what it’s called. as you can persuade the bulk of the biggest buyers and vendors to move over to the newest platform,’

Term regarding the street is in this revised variation, information protection will closely be much more guarded and will also be ‘baked’ into codes. The FBI did crack the last site, so whether or not they can do therefore on Silk Road 2.0, remains to be seen. FBI Special Agent Christopher Tarbel who assisted break the site that is initial say that Silk Road in its initial structure ended up being possibly the greatest and most sophisticated unlawful marketplace on the online world today.

Massachusetts State Gambling Commission Hears Revere Casino Plan

Boston defeated, but Revere approved, a Suffolk Downs casino; now exactly what? (Image: Patrick Whittemore)

It still the same casino if you move a casino over a city line, is? This is not a complex philosophical question, but alternatively the situation dealing with Massachusetts state regulators now, because well as both supporters and detractors of a casino at the Suffolk Downs racetrack.

Whose Border Can It Be, Anyway?

If you have been following the news out of Massachusetts, you know that East Boston voters soundly rejected a casino at the race track, while neighboring Revere easily approved the same proposal. Since then, Suffolk Downs and Revere officials have actually considered moving the project so that in the place of straddling the town line in the East Boston part it could be located entirely inside of Revere’s city borders, where voters have already approved it. But that seemingly simple concept has generated protests from East Boston officials and voters whom believed they had shot down the casino once and for all.

The Massachusetts Gambling Commission took testimony and information in from all sides later a week ago and there was a great amount of debate between advocates on both sides. And also the decision was uncertain sufficient that the commission decided that they’ll further study all aspects of the votes before proceeding, including the host agreements, the wording associated with ballot questions, and the statutory laws that allow for casino gambling into the state.

One of many major players at the meeting, naturally, was Revere Mayor Dan Rizzo. He revealed as much as the commission face-to-face to argue that the host agreement finalized by Revere anticipated the possibility that some or all of the casino’s development could take place in their town.

The key language comes from a passage within the host community agreement regarding the potential for expansion of the Suffolk Downs casino. It states that when Suffolk Downs ‘seeks to grow its gaming establishment on the Revere property,’ the track owners will require to ‘promptly notify the city and the events shall negotiate in good faith an amendment to this agreement.’

Rizzo and other politicians representing Revere say that this passage provides the city an avenue with which to negotiate a casino that is new solely on land inside of Revere proper.

But opponents from East Boston say that this is absurd. They say that the language shows that Revere wasn’t expecting a casino that is entire be situated on their land, and point to another passage that seems to online casino winner clearly show that the standing agreements only apply to the East Boston proposal.

‘ As planned, the project would be constructed within the municipal boundaries of the populous city of Boston,’ the Revere host agreement states.

Revere voted in favor of the Suffolk Downs casino, with about 60 percent of voters approving it. While Mayor Rizzo says that an all-Revere casino would have gotten even more votes, Boston officials say that still does not mean that a vote regarding the East Boston proposal equates to approval for the casino that is revere-based.

‘Voters in East Boston decisively voted ‘No’ to a casino at Suffolk Downs. Because of that, voters in Revere authorized a proposal that is no longer viable,’ a statement from Boston officials declared.

No Time to Waste

There’s no timetable for when the gambling payment will come back by having a decision on the instance, though the choice will come before the likely year-end deadline for submitting casino applications to the state.

Meanwhile, Revere and Suffolk Downs are hoping that a possible deal with the Mohegan Sun could bolster their chances of getting their new plan approved. While no announcement that is official been made, Mayor Rizzo has said that he thinks a partnership might be imminent, perhaps happening as early as this week. If it happens, Mohegan Sun will step right into a partnership voided by Caesars Entertainment, when that company bailed following allegations of third-party associations with a mob that is russian by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission.